Sam Allardyce rejects the long-ball stereotype, explains why he views Cristian Romero as a risk for Manchester United and remains linked to a Premier League comeback after a punditry stint
Topics covered
Rewriting a reputation: the long-ball debate
Sam Allardyce, now 71, has spent much of his post-management career fighting a label he says never fit: the caricature of a one‑dimensional long-ball coach. Speaking as a broadcaster and occasional managerial candidate, the former Bolton and England boss has pushed back against the shorthand that still follows him — especially the version that reduces his teams to aimless aerial bombardment.
On air and in interviews, Allardyce has been at pains to explain what he sees as the missing context. His sides, he argues, placed heavy emphasis on organisation, set-piece routines and a variety of attacking approaches alongside any use of direct passes.
Scouting, player profiles and detailed match plans, he says, were the backbone of his selection and tactics — not some knee-jerk reliance on hoofing the ball forward. He also complains that modern punditry often rewards snappy labels and overlooks the technical and analytical work that goes into squad-building.
That frustration underpins his critique of how reputations form. Isolated plays or a handful of long passes can become an entire narrative, he says, while the quieter elements — transitional pressing, defensive shape, rehearsed set-pieces — get little airtime. Allardyce points to what he sees as a double standard: pragmatic, physical approaches draw harsher scrutiny when they come from managers at less glamorous clubs, while the same methods can be lauded as “tactical discipline” when practiced by the big names.
Romero, risk and a clash with Paul Scholes
Allardyce’s argument goes beyond systems to the human chemistry inside a dressing room. He tells colourful stories from his Bolton days — odd initiation rituals and the small, sometimes bewildering moments that bind a squad — to stress that psychology and personalities matter as much as formations.
That human element features in his recent criticism of Paul Scholes’s suggestion that Cristian Romero would be a fit for Manchester United. On the No Tippy Tappy Football podcast, Allardyce called Romero “too risky” for a side prioritising defensive solidity. His point: a central defender’s primary job is to stop goals. Ball-playing ability is useful, but it shouldn’t replace reliable tackling, positional awareness and leadership at the back. Put simply, a defender who looks pretty on the ball but struggles in one-on-one duels can create more problems than he solves.
Allardyce frames his disagreement with Scholes as a clash of philosophies — a wider conversation about how modern recruitment increasingly prizes progressive passing over basic defensive skills. He’s wary of academy systems and scouting models that elevate forward passing metrics at the expense of stopping power and game management. If clubs skew too far toward technical flair, he warns, they risk defensive instability.
Where next for Allardyce: pundit, podcast host and managerial contender
Allardyce remains a visible voice in football. He hosts No Tippy Tappy Football, pops up as a studio pundit, and is periodically linked with short-term managerial vacancies. His stock in trade — set-piece planning, defensive structure and pragmatic fixes — makes him a natural candidate for clubs chasing immediate improvement rather than long-term rebuilds.
That reputation for being a short-term stabiliser keeps his name in the frame. He holds the record for managing the most different Premier League clubs and most recently had a brief spell at Leeds United in that ended in relegation. Still, clubs battling relegation or seeking a quick turnaround regularly consider figures with his experience. When survival is the priority, many boards favour a proven, safety-first approach.
What’s clear is that Allardyce’s views are consistent with a career built on practical solutions. He rejects neat dismissals like “long-ball” and prefers to talk about defensive reliability, discipline and the nuts-and-bolts work that produces results. Whether he returns to the dugout will depend on market demands: when a club wants fast, pragmatic fixes rather than patient project-building, expect his name to resurface.
