The SHANTI Act 2026: Transforming India's Nuclear Patent Landscape The SHANTI Act 2026 represents a pivotal advancement in India's nuclear patent framework, fostering innovation while upholding rigorous security protocols. This landmark legislation not only paves the way for groundbreaking developments in nuclear technology but also ensures the protection of intellectual property rights, facilitating a robust environment for research and development. With the SHANTI Act, India positions...
Topics covered
The landscape of nuclear energy patents in India is undergoing significant changes, following the introduction of the Sustainable Harnessing and Advancement of Nuclear Energy for Transforming India (SHANTI) Act. This legislation marks a shift from a strict prohibition on patenting nuclear inventions to a more flexible framework that permits conditional patents, promoting innovation while addressing security concerns.
Historically, India’s patent regulations regarding nuclear technology were shaped by Section 4 of the Patents Act of 1970 and Section 20 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1962. These laws imposed a blanket ban on any invention related to atomic energy, regardless of its potential civilian applications.
As India’s energy landscape evolved, this stringent restriction became increasingly at odds with the need for innovation in a rapidly changing technological environment.
Shifting from exclusion to a conditional framework
The SHANTI Act fundamentally changes this approach by allowing the Central Government to grant patents for inventions aimed at peaceful uses of nuclear energy.
This significant modification introduces a dual-layered system: while some activities remain strictly under government control, many other inventions can now be evaluated based on their technical merits rather than their association with nuclear technology.
Defining the boundaries of patentability
Under the new framework, the Central Government retains authority over high-risk activities, such as enrichment, reprocessing, and the management of spent fuel. These processes are specifically reserved for state control to mitigate national security risks. However, the law now allows a broader range of inventions—such as safety devices, medical applications, and control systems—to be evaluated for patent eligibility.
This new paradigm enables innovations that might have previously been dismissed solely due to their nuclear context to be considered for patent protection, provided they do not infringe on sensitive areas defined by the government.
A critical aspect of the SHANTI Act is the introduction of a sensitivity screening process. As outlined in Section 38, the responsibility for assessing whether an invention poses security implications lies with the Central Government. If deemed sensitive, the state claims ownership of the invention, thereby preventing patent issuance.
Implications for inventors and researchers
This provision introduces a level of uncertainty for innovators and researchers. Unlike the previous clearly defined exclusion, the SHANTI Act leaves the concept of sensitivity somewhat ambiguous. There are no explicit criteria provided within the law for applicants to reference, which could lead to unpredictability in the patent application process. As the regulatory environment evolves, applicants may find themselves navigating a complex landscape of compliance and assessment.
Moreover, the SHANTI Act introduces a pre-disclosure obligation in Section 38 (5), requiring inventors to notify the government before revealing any inventions related to nuclear energy. This requirement aims to provide the government with preliminary insight into potentially sensitive technologies, adding an extra layer of compliance that is not typically found in standard patent practices.
Fostering innovation while safeguarding security
Despite these complexities, the SHANTI Act opens up avenues for research and development in nuclear technology. Section 9 explicitly allows individuals to engage in research related to nuclear energy for peaceful purposes, provided they avoid state-reserved areas. This balance seeks to promote scientific advancement while ensuring that critical national security interests remain protected.
As the SHANTI Act integrates with the existing Patents Act, it does not simply eliminate the nuclear carve-out but rather redefines it. The examination of patents related to nuclear technology will now require applicants to navigate both traditional patentability criteria and the new SHANTI sensitivity filter, necessitating clear coordination between the Patent Office and the Department of Atomic Energy.
Future opportunities and challenges
Historically, India’s patent regulations regarding nuclear technology were shaped by Section 4 of the Patents Act of 1970 and Section 20 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1962. These laws imposed a blanket ban on any invention related to atomic energy, regardless of its potential civilian applications. As India’s energy landscape evolved, this stringent restriction became increasingly at odds with the need for innovation in a rapidly changing technological environment.0
Historically, India’s patent regulations regarding nuclear technology were shaped by Section 4 of the Patents Act of 1970 and Section 20 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1962. These laws imposed a blanket ban on any invention related to atomic energy, regardless of its potential civilian applications. As India’s energy landscape evolved, this stringent restriction became increasingly at odds with the need for innovation in a rapidly changing technological environment.1
