From Makerfield to the brink of 10 Downing Street, Andy Burnham's political journey has taken a dramatic turn in just one week.

In the fast-paced world of politics, a week can bring about significant changes. This has been particularly evident in the case of Andy Burnham, who has seen his political career take a dramatic turn following the Makerfield by-election.
Meanwhile, the political landscape in the United States has been marked by a study revealing the motivations of Trump supporters, shedding light on their opposition to democratic principles.
Burnham’s rapid ascent has been nothing short of meteoric. Just one week after the Makerfield by-election, he stands on the brink of becoming the UK’s seventh Prime Minister in a decade.
His journey has been marked by a series of swift and strategic moves, showcasing his political acumen and ambition.
Burnham’s Whirlwind Week
Since the announcement of the Makerfield by-election results by Alison McKenzie-Folan, Burnham’s schedule has been packed with significant events.
He bid an emotional farewell to his staff at the Greater Manchester Combined Authority, marking the end of his nine-year tenure as Greater Manchester Mayor. Following this, he traveled to London to be sworn in as Makerfield’s new MP, capturing a moment of camaraderie with fellow Labour MPs in a smiling selfie inside Westminster.
The selfie notably included Chancellor Rachel Reeves, who had been conspicuously absent from Keir Starmer’s resignation speech earlier that day. This omission sparked speculation about the dynamics within the Labour Party and the potential shifts in power that Burnham’s rise could bring.
Secret Meetings and Leadership Race
On Tuesday, reports surfaced that Burnham and Starmer had met at a secret location. With Burnham currently the sole candidate in the Labour leadership race, he could potentially become Prime Minister as early as July 17. His swift rise from confirming his candidacy in the Makerfield by-election to the brink of the highest office in the land highlights the volatile nature of contemporary politics.
Forming the Cabinet: Burnham’s Priority List
At the top of Burnham’s agenda is the formation of his Cabinet, starting with the crucial role of Chancellor. Rachel Reeves is widely expected to be demoted to a more junior position, with potential replacements including Ed Miliband, Shabana Mahmood, and Wes Streeting. Mahmood, who is believed to favor remaining as Home Secretary, is likely to be rewarded for her loyalty and the role she played in Burnham’s landslide victory in Makerfield.
Burnham’s inner circle, which includes key figures such as Sheffield Heeley MP Louise Haigh, Knowsley MP Anneliese Midgley, and Peckham MP Miatta Fahnbulleh, is expected to play significant roles in his new administration. Other notable names include GM deputy mayor Kate Green, Josh Simons, and Lucy Powell, MP for Manchester Central since 2012. Kevin Lee, Burnham’s closest adviser, is almost certain to secure a senior role in the new-look 10 Downing Street.
The Politics of Spite: Understanding Trump Supporters
Across the Atlantic, a recent ethnographic study has shed light on the motivations of Trump supporters, revealing a stark opposition to democratic principles. The study, sponsored by the Johns Hopkins Agora Institute, interviewed voters in Michigan, South Carolina, and Wyoming, uncovering a coherent worldview that is at odds with the ideals of democracy.
The participants in the study viewed themselves as a minority under threat from a tyrannical majority. They perceived democracy as a form of mob rule, ignoring the constitutional safeguards designed to prevent such outcomes. This perspective was encapsulated by one participant who stated, ‘I don’t value democracy, because we wouldn’t be heard.’ Another participant extended this logic, suggesting that democracy would lead to the marginalization of small towns and rural communities.
The study found that these voters actively oppose majority rule, preferring minority rule instead. They view Democrats as immoral due to their support for racial diversity, LGBTQ rights, feminism, and the separation of church and state. This opposition is not based on policy or economic issues but rather on a deep-seated anger towards those who hold different values.
The study’s findings highlight the challenges faced by Democrats in appealing to voters who are motivated by anger and a desire to impose their values on others. As one commentator noted, ‘We are firmly out of the realm of policy here. Or reality, even.’ This sentiment underscores the complex and often contentious nature of contemporary politics.
