Two young men escape jail time after a harrowing abduction case in Aberdeen.
Topics covered
In a shocking case that has captured public attention, two young men, Jack Airens and Chase Johnstone, both aged 20, have evaded a prison sentence after pleading guilty to abducting and humiliating a man in Aberdeen. The incident, which involved a ransom demand from the victim’s mother, has raised serious concerns about youth crime and the judicial response to such acts.
Details of the abduction
The harrowing events unfolded on April 25, 2023, when Airens and Johnstone, along with an accomplice, targeted their victim in Peterhead. They believed he owed them money and decided to take matters into their own hands.
The trio followed the man from a local pub, where they launched a brutal attack, beating him until he fell to the ground. CCTV footage captured the shocking moment as they dragged him through the town center, instilling fear in both the victim and onlookers.
Ransom demand and humiliation
Once they had taken the man to a flat in Aberdeen, the ordeal escalated. The victim was forced to sit on a chair while Johnstone demanded to know where the money was. When the victim claimed ignorance, he was met with violence, suffering multiple punches to the head. The situation took a further turn for the worse when they instructed him to contact his mother via Snapchat, demanding £1,500 for his safe return. The victim’s mother, hearing her son’s terrified pleas, initially attempted to gather the money but ultimately contacted the police instead.
Legal repercussions and community service
Despite the severity of their actions, Sheriff Ian Wallace decided against a custodial sentence, citing the immaturity of the offenders at the time of the crime. Instead, both Airens and Johnstone were placed under a community payback order, requiring them to complete 200 hours of unpaid work. Additionally, they were subjected to a restriction of liberty order for one year. This decision has sparked debate about the effectiveness of the justice system in dealing with youth offenders, particularly in cases involving violence and intimidation.
The case serves as a stark reminder of the potential consequences of youth crime and the importance of addressing such behavior early on. As communities grapple with rising concerns over safety and crime, the judicial system’s approach to young offenders will undoubtedly continue to be scrutinized.
