Elizabeth Sweeney claims self-defense in the murder trial of Neil Jolly.

Topics covered
A woman has entered the courtroom facing serious allegations of murder in a high-profile case in Aberdeen. Elizabeth Sweeney, 36, is accused of violently assaulting 51-year-old Neil Jolly in his flat at Marischal Court. The prosecution claims that Sweeney struck Jolly multiple times with a kettle, leading to his death.
Details of the incident
The charges against Sweeney include not only the murder itself but also attempts to conceal the crime. Prosecutors allege that she attempted to wash Jolly’s body in a shower and covered him with a duvet cover after the incident.
Furthermore, Sweeney is accused of cleaning the kettle used in the assault to destroy evidence. The events are said to have occurred between June 22 and June 26, 2023, a timeframe that has raised questions about the circumstances surrounding the alleged murder.
Claims of self-defense
Throughout the trial, Sweeney has maintained her innocence, asserting a special defense of self-defense. On the first day of the trial at the High Court in Aberdeen, jurors listened to a distressing phone call made by Sweeney to the police. In the call, she claimed to have woken up to find Jolly raping her, which she stated led to her violent reaction. This claim of being a victim of sexual assault adds a complex layer to the case, as it raises questions about the nature of the encounter between Sweeney and Jolly.
Gruesome evidence presented
The jury was shown harrowing body-worn footage from police officers who responded to Sweeney’s call. Upon entering Jolly’s flat, they discovered his body covered in blood, lying beneath a bedsheet in the bathroom. The scene was described as chaotic, with blood-soaked carpets and bloody rags scattered throughout the apartment. This evidence paints a grim picture of the events that transpired and will be crucial in determining Sweeney’s fate.
Police response and Sweeney’s demeanor
After making the emergency call, Sweeney was found in a distressed state near a telephone box on King Street. Body-worn footage captured her pleading with officers to arrest her, indicating a sense of guilt or fear. During her interactions with the police, she repeatedly expressed concern for Jolly’s well-being, stating, “I don’t know if he’s alive or not.” This emotional turmoil may play a significant role in the jury’s perception of her character and the legitimacy of her self-defense claim.
Continuing the trial
The trial, presided over by Judge Andrew Miller, is ongoing, with further evidence and testimonies expected to unfold in the coming days. As the case develops, it will be essential to examine the nuances of Sweeney’s claims and the evidence presented by the prosecution. The outcome of this trial could have significant implications for both Sweeney and the broader community in Aberdeen.