David Gilmour's new garden shed has sparked a heated dispute with his Hampstead neighbors, raising questions about planning permissions.

Topics covered
In a surprising twist, the ongoing dispute between Pink Floyd guitarist David Gilmour and his neighbors in Hampstead has become a hot topic of conversation. This 79-year-old rock legend has found himself at the center of controversy over a garden shed that has sparked significant complaints.
Gilmour submitted a retrospective planning application for a green shed that measures just under two-by-three meters, nestled in the back corner of his garden. While intended to replace a previous structure, this new shed has become a focal point of tension among local residents.
What could possibly go wrong with a garden shed?
The Shed that Stirred Up a Storm
The planning application has stirred unrest in the Hampstead community, facing strong pushback from the Hampstead Hill Gardens Residents’ Association. In their letter of objection, they contend that the shed is “obtrusive, overbearing, and significantly more visually and physically intrusive” than the original structures that were previously approved.
Although the application was supposed to stick to the footprint of the earlier buildings, locals allege that this new shed is now positioned two meters closer to the boundary fence. Could this really be just a garden shed, or is there more to the story?
“We hope the Council will act swiftly to have it removed to prevent further damage to neighborhood amenity,” the association stated. They are urging Camden Council to reject the application, warning that allowing such a structure could set a troubling precedent for future applicants to disregard planning permissions. Is this just about a shed, or does it reflect broader concerns about community standards?
Community Voices: More Than Just Complaints
Local residents are making their voices heard, with one neighbor expressing frustration over the shed’s close proximity to the fence. “The applicant’s garden is long while ours is short, making the shed stand out even more. Their gain is our loss,” the resident remarked, underscoring the emotional impact this construction has had on the community. Have they lost more than just their view?
Moreover, the Hampstead Neighbourhood Forum has raised alarms about wildlife access, requesting a gap behind the shed to ensure animals can navigate the area freely. Another resident reported seeing extensive foundations during construction, questioning the true purpose of what was initially described simply as a garden shed. Are there hidden implications behind this seemingly harmless structure?
Gilmour’s Defense: A Modest Response
Facing the backlash, Gilmour’s household has stepped up to defend the shed, claiming it replaces two previous structures while aiming to have less environmental impact. They argue that the new shed features traditional construction and is painted green to minimize its visual footprint. “The modest size and careful design mean there would be no harm to the setting of the listed building or to neighboring structures,” the application asserts. But do the locals see it that way?
Gilmour is no stranger to property developments, with a notable seaside mansion in Hove and a history of charitable actions, including donating proceeds from a property sale to a homelessness charity. As this situation unfolds, community members continue to voice their concerns while awaiting the Council’s decision. What will the outcome be, and how might it shape future planning regulations in the area? The stakes are high, and everyone is watching closely.




