A significant petition against the Edmonton Green low-traffic scheme highlights local discontent with proposed traffic changes and safety concerns.
Topics covered
More than 1,500 residents in Edmonton have signed a petition urging Enfield Council to suspend its plans for a low-traffic neighborhood in Edmonton Green. The initiative, known as the “Edmonton Green Quieter Neighbourhood,” has ignited considerable debate among locals, who express concerns about potential road closures and increased congestion.
A statutory consultation on the final proposal is set to begin later this month.
Petition Details and Local Concerns
The petition, initiated by the Edmonton and Winchmore Hill Conservative Association, contends that the proposed changes would lead to road closures, one-way systems, and reduced parking availability.
Residents argue that these measures may exacerbate existing issues, resulting in heightened pollution and longer journey times. The association has characterized the initiative as part of the Labour administration’s “anti-car agenda,” raising alarms about the financial implications of implementing such a scheme.
Local residents have voiced strong opposition, indicating that previous low-traffic neighborhoods (LTNs) in the borough have caused significant disruption. The council’s earlier initiatives in Palmers Green and Bowes Park drew criticism, and recent changes proposed for Bowes Park were partly in response to pressure from drivers seeking easier access to their homes.
“We believe the Edmonton Green scheme will not only inconvenience residents but also contribute to more pollution and traffic,” said a spokesperson for the Conservative Association. “It’s essential that the council listens to the voices of the community before moving forward.”
Support for the Scheme Amidst Opposition
Despite the growing petition, some community members advocate for the low-traffic measures. Alex Atherton, representing the advocacy group Better Streets for Enfield, argues that quieter neighborhoods are essential for creating safer and healthier environments. “The evidence supporting the success of these initiatives is very clear,” Atherton stated. “Edmonton Green residents deserve a better solution that prioritizes public safety and accessibility.”
Atherton’s group highlights the potential health benefits of implementing the scheme, citing improved air quality and enhanced safety for pedestrians and cyclists. A previous public consultation revealed that many residents expressed interest in features such as speed limits and the arrangement of one-way streets.
As discussions continue, a council spokesperson emphasized the importance of the upcoming consultation, stating that feedback from residents will be integral to shaping the final design. “We are committed to creating safer, healthier, and more sustainable streets for the Edmonton Green community,” they added.
Looking Ahead to the Consultation Process
The statutory consultation is anticipated to launch later this month, with specific dates to be confirmed. The council has acknowledged the high number of traffic collisions in Edmonton Green, underscoring the need for improved safety measures.
“Edmonton Green has been identified as a priority location for improvements,” the spokesperson noted. “We aim to facilitate better connections and ensure that local amenities are accessible for walking and cycling.”
As the community prepares for the consultation, residents are encouraged to participate actively, voicing their opinions and concerns. The council has assured that no final decisions will be made until after the consultation concludes, allowing for careful consideration of all feedback.
The petition, initiated by the Edmonton and Winchmore Hill Conservative Association, contends that the proposed changes would lead to road closures, one-way systems, and reduced parking availability. Residents argue that these measures may exacerbate existing issues, resulting in heightened pollution and longer journey times. The association has characterized the initiative as part of the Labour administration’s “anti-car agenda,” raising alarms about the financial implications of implementing such a scheme.0
