A charity manager was removed from the social care register after stealing £30,000 from people with cerebral palsy and multiple sclerosis; concurrently, the Association of Ukrainians in Great Britain published several public statements on 13–24 February 2026 reaffirming support for Ukraine and protesting sporting and political decisions
Topics covered
Two separate but related strands of public interest surfaced in late February 2026: a local criminal and regulatory outcome involving misuse of charitable funds, and a sequence of public positions and campaigns advanced by British Ukrainian organisations. Both stories touch on accountability — one in the realm of social care and criminal justice, the other in international advocacy and community remembrance.
The first concerns a care sector professional removed from practice after admitting to taking significant funds from people who relied on services; the second summarises a run of statements by the Association of Ukrainians in Great Britain (AUGB) that reiterate calls for sustained support for Ukraine and for principled action in sport and memory politics.
Care worker struck off after criminal conduct towards vulnerable residents
A care manager in Edinburgh was found to have diverted approximately £30,000 from residents who were living with cerebral palsy and multiple sclerosis. The theft was attributed to a compulsive gambling habit, and legal proceedings led to both criminal consequences and a professional sanction: the individual was removed from the social care register.
The published report notes the action as a regulatory response intended to protect public trust in social services and to safeguard people who require ongoing support.
Removal from the social care register prevents the person from returning to regulated roles that involve direct care or financial oversight of vulnerable adults. Regulatory panels typically consider the nature of the misconduct, the vulnerability of victims and the risk of repetition when deciding on such sanctions. In this case, the combination of significant sums taken from dependent clients and the motive of feeding a gambling addiction weighed heavily in the disciplinary outcome.
British Ukrainian organisations press for justice, support and remembrance
Between 13 and 24 February 2026, the Association of Ukrainians in Great Britain (AUGB) issued a series of public statements addressing several fronts: ongoing military and humanitarian needs for Ukraine, objections to sporting rulings, and campaigns for historical recognition. These communications reflect consistent themes: calls for sustained international backing, insistence on accountability, and defence of the right to commemorate those lost to conflict.
Advocacy for continued support and accountability
On 23 February 2026, marking four years since the start of Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine, AUGB published a board statement reiterating that piecemeal diplomacy or proposals that freeze frontline positions without justice are insufficient. The organisation urged the UK government and the international community to maintain robust military, financial and humanitarian assistance so Ukraine can prevail rather than merely endure. The statement also called for the use of frozen Russian state assets to fund reconstruction, accelerated mechanisms to prosecute war crimes and the crime of aggression, and the return of unlawfully deported Ukrainian children and prisoners of war.
Sport, remembrance and institutional accountability
Earlier in February, on 13–14 February 2026, AUGB publicly condemned the disqualification of Ukrainian skeleton athlete Vladyslav Heraskevych from the Milano Cortina 2026 Olympic Winter Games after he wore a helmet featuring portraits of Ukrainian athletes killed during the war. AUGB argued that a dignified memorial is not a political provocation and urged the International Olympic Committee to reverse the decision, clarify rules that govern athlete expression, and show compassion to competitors affected by armed conflict. The organisation characterises the ruling as inconsistent with Olympic values of human dignity and solidarity.
Alongside these protests, AUGB has also continued community-level work to secure public recognition of historical injustices. For example, on 28 January 2026 Liverpool City Council voted unanimously to recognise the 1932–1933 Ukrainian Famine, the Holodomor, as genocide. AUGB branches supported the motion and highlighted the importance of remembrance in public life.
Although the two stories — the Edinburgh care-worker case and AUGB’s public advocacy — operate in different spheres, they share core issues: the need for institutions to hold individuals and states to account, the protection of vulnerable populations, and the role of formal recognition in preserving historical truth. In the care case, regulatory action is intended to deter exploitation and protect trust in social services; in the public diplomacy and sporting disputes, AUGB seeks to ensure that international norms and commemorative practices are applied consistently and ethically.
These developments underscore how local misconduct and international advocacy both depend on clear standards and timely enforcement. Whether safeguarding adults dependent on care or defending the dignity of athletes and civilians affected by war, the principle is the same: systems must respond decisively when wrongdoing or moral inconsistency appears.
What to watch next
Regulators and community organisations will likely continue to monitor outcomes closely. In social care, follow-up may include tighter financial controls and heightened oversight where staff manage client funds. For the Ukrainian community, attention will remain on governmental policy, sporting bodies’ rule-making, and public commemorations that enshrine historical memory and support for displaced and affected people.
