×
google news

CalMac faces backlash over new livestock transport regulations

New regulations require qualified personnel for livestock transport, raising concerns among farmers.

Protest against CalMac's new livestock transport rules
CalMac faces criticism for new livestock transport regulations impacting farmers.

The ferry operator Caledonian MacBrayne, commonly known as CalMac, is under fire from farmers and crofters following the introduction of new regulations by the UK Animal and Plant Health Agency (APHA). These regulations mandate that livestock traveling on ferries for more than three hours must be accompanied by a qualified individual capable of euthanizing the animals if necessary.

This requirement has raised significant concerns among agricultural communities, particularly those on remote islands like Barra.

Challenges for farmers and crofters

The new rules present a myriad of challenges for farmers and crofters who rely on ferry services to transport their livestock.

With the requirement for a qualified person to accompany the animals, many farmers are left scrambling to find someone who meets these criteria. Alternatively, they may have to resort to a lengthy detour to transport their livestock to the mainland via Lochmaddy, which not only increases travel time but also poses risks to animal welfare.

Longer journey times can lead to increased stress and discomfort for the animals, raising ethical concerns among livestock keepers. The Scottish Crofting Federation (SCF) has described the policy as “nonsensical,” highlighting the impracticality of the regulations and the potential for negative impacts on animal welfare.

Concerns over euthanasia procedures

One of the most pressing issues raised by the SCF is the lack of clarity regarding euthanasia procedures. The federation pointed out that the only feasible option for euthanasia in such situations would be a captive bolt, as it is unlikely that a veterinarian would be available to administer a lethal injection. This raises critical questions: Who would determine if euthanasia is necessary? How would the animal be restrained during the process? And what would happen to the carcass afterward?

Donna Smith, chief executive of the SCF, expressed her concerns that these regulations could lead to livestock keepers abandoning their operations due to the overwhelming burden of compliance. She emphasized that the ripple effects of these regulations could extend beyond farmers to affect various businesses, including hauliers and CalMac itself.

CalMac’s response and future discussions

In response to the backlash, CalMac has urged farmers and crofters not to direct their frustrations at port staff or vessel crew, as they are not responsible for the new regulations. A spokesperson for CalMac acknowledged the surprise and confusion surrounding the sudden change in policy and reiterated the company’s commitment to finding a solution that accommodates the needs of farmers while adhering to regulatory requirements.

CalMac has stated that they are in discussions with stakeholders, including the National Farmers Union Scotland (NFUS), to address the challenges posed by the new regulations. The ferry operator is working diligently to navigate these changes and is hopeful for a resolution that will allow for the safe and humane transport of livestock without compromising animal welfare.

As the situation develops, it remains crucial for all parties involved to engage in constructive dialogue to ensure that the interests of farmers, crofters, and ferry operators are balanced with the need for animal welfare and compliance with health regulations.


Contacts:

More To Read