The debate over the Bayeux Tapestry's relocation intensifies as David Hockney raises alarm bells over its safety.
Topics covered
The Bayeux Tapestry, a cherished artifact with nearly a millennium of history, is about to embark on an unprecedented journey across the English Channel. This monumental event has sparked a heated discussion within cultural circles, particularly with the outspoken British artist David Hockney taking a firm stance against the relocation.
His passionate arguments raise significant concerns regarding conservation and the potential risks involved in moving such a fragile piece of art.
Hockney’s strong objections
As plans unfold for the tapestry to be displayed at the British Museum, critics—including Hockney—are questioning the wisdom of this decision.
Describing the move as madness, Hockney emphasizes that the tapestry, which is vulnerable due to its age and material, should remain in its current location. “Some things are too precious to take a risk with. Moving the Bayeux Tapestry is one of them,” he asserted, highlighting its unparalleled status as the most complete narrative artwork in Europe.
A tapestry of history
This extraordinary piece of art is more than just a visual masterpiece; it is a historical document that spans over 70 meters and includes 58 scenes filled with intricate details, such as 626 characters and 202 horses, narrating the events leading up to the Battle of Hastings in 1066. Commissioned by Bishop Odo of Bayeux, a half-brother to William the Conqueror, and believed to have been crafted in Canterbury, the tapestry has withstood the test of time, surviving revolutions and wars to become a symbol of both French and English heritage.
At 88 years old and residing in Normandy, Hockney has a deep personal connection to the tapestry. Having first encountered it in the late 1960s and visiting it multiple times recently, he reflects on how it has profoundly influenced his life. “It is nearly a thousand years old, more than 70 meters in length, and fragile, which makes it madness to think of moving it. It is too big a risk,” he lamented.
Concerns over conservation
Hockney’s fears are not rooted merely in nostalgia but are supported by significant conservation concerns. The tapestry’s delicate linen backing and fragile wool embroidery threads are susceptible to damage from stress during any handling. He warns that actions such as rolling, unrolling, or improperly managing the tapestry could result in tearing, loss of stitches, or even distortion of the fabric. The current controlled environment in Bayeux has protected it for centuries, and any sudden changes in temperature, humidity, or exposure to light could compromise its integrity.
The ethics of display
Moreover, conservation standards generally advocate for minimal handling of ancient textiles. Each phase of the tapestry’s movement—from packing and transportation to display—introduces new risks that could jeopardize its preservation. Hockney raises a critical question: is the British Museum’s desire to attract more visitors worth the potential harm to this invaluable piece of history? He suggests creating a high-quality replica for exhibition instead of risking the original.
Institutional responses and diplomatic implications
In response to the backlash, the British Museum has defended its position, asserting confidence in its ability to handle and conserve the tapestry. Nicholas Cullinan, the museum’s director, stated, “We understand these concerns, but we have a world-leading conservation team equipped to ensure the safety of this artifact.” He emphasizes that the museum has a long-standing record of successfully transporting and displaying ancient pieces, including textiles that predate the Bayeux Tapestry.
To address the growing opposition, French and British officials have taken proactive measures. The tapestry has been removed from display and is currently stored to prepare for its journey to London. An administrative agreement mandates that the British Museum conduct a dry run of the transportation process, with strict limits on vibrations to minimize damage. Despite the tapestry being insured for an astonishing £800 million, Hockney dismisses this as inadequate, stating that the artifact is priceless.
The loan of the tapestry has also become a matter of diplomatic significance, with French President Emmanuel Macron seeking guarantees for its safety amid rising concerns from French art critics and the public. The agreement to loan the tapestry serves as a gesture of goodwill between France and Britain, coinciding with the exchange of British artifacts to museums in Normandy.
While there are arguments in favor of the tapestry’s move, emphasizing the educational opportunities it presents to British audiences, the ongoing debate underscores the delicate balance between cultural exchange and the preservation of irreplaceable heritage. As the tapestry awaits its journey, the world watches, caught between excitement and apprehension over this momentous decision.
