×
google news

Superstock classes to be dropped in 2014 to make room for a 250cc series?

Last month the FIM held a meeting in their headquarters in Geneva with Dorna, Infront and 23 teams and 5 manufacturers involved in the FIM Superbike World Championship.
In the sanitized press statement very little was revealed of what was actually discussed during the meeting except for calendars and technical rules for 2013 and that would further meetings to discuss the technical and operational changes that will be introduced starting in 2014.

PTR Honda World Supersport Team Principal Simon Buckmaster in his ‘Simon Says’ newsletter was the first who revealed what may have actually been discussed for the future of the series including the understanding that as expected a control ECU will be on the way, but mostly it was his opinion on cost saving measures from logistical support, to engine and tire restrictions, all which makes for a very good read (after the jump).

However it is Italy’s Motosprint that seems to have a much clearer picture of what the very near future could hold for the production derived based series now that has now fallen under the rule of Dorna.
If you’re a Superstock 1000 and Superstock 600 fan you may want to weep, as it seems that two categories will be eliminated and reportedly make room for a new production based 250cc class.

Back in October, Carmelo Ezpeleta gave a first hint regarding Superbikes future: “to set up both championships with their own spirit.
One is from bikes based on production motorcycles, and another is for prototypes” so the Superbike category as well as Supersport will be dumbed down to almost stock level (you can’t have those current pesky super-tuned Superbikes almost fast as prototype MotoGP machinery) to make them closer to what you can actually buy at your local dealer (and not with those fake headlight decals that are supposed to make you believe that you are actually riding Max Biaggi’s Aprilia RSV-4 or Kenan Sofuoglu’s Kawasaki ZX-6R).
Besides what will turn into cost saving measures with tighter rules to fight the tentacles of the economic crisis, hopefully making it cheaper to run a squad will also open the door to other teams and give them a chance to join the world scene, but for Dorna the name of the game is selling TV rights, and three classes are easier to sell than four (believe it or not Superstock and Supersport races has never been broadcasted live in Italy on TV – you could only see it via streaming or on a satellite channel – that will however change now that Mediaset has bought the TV rights for 2013).
World Superbikes has been garnering more and more attention and the racing has been 100 times more exciting that MotoGP – even if the 2013 WSBK grid is dwindling and so far has just 16 riders confirmed this season- but the moot question is dumbing down the entire WSBK series really to make it cheaper and easier to sell and continue the fantasy of race on Sunday and sell on Monday or is it just to insure that MotoGP remains the premier class of racing? ———————————————————————————————————-Simon Says: Meeting with DornaWe recently had a meeting in Geneva with Dorna and all teams to discuss the way forward for Superbike and Supersport now Dorna runs both WSB and MotoGP.
Obviously everyone was eager to hear what Dorna had to say with all the rumour of what they may or may not have in mind.
It appears Dorna want our opinions before making any decisions.
We all know that they are in a difficult position here as we all have our own agendas and you cannot please everyone.
I think we all know we will be going to a control ECU; how can we not when Moto 2 already run under this and MotoGP seems to be going that way, albeit with some compromise from Dorna for the big manufactures.
BSB does this very well though, with Motec for both Superbike and Supersport.
If Motec were the chosen control ECU it would be a good choice as many Supersport teams already run Motec and the desire to have a more common rule for Superbike across the world would at least match BSB and WSB, making the wild card rides that have been such a positive feature over the years and produced such thrilling races a more realistic possibility for the BSB teams and even world teams in BSB races.
What we do all need to be aware of is this is not the massive cost saving some people think, well not in Supersport anyway.
For instance if it went the way of the fashionable Magnetti Morelli it may indeed be a higher cost, something none of us need.
In reality we will still need a data technician to make sure we get the best out of the rules whatever they end up being.
The biggest cost is actually the logistics of racing, I.
E.
freight, staff and travel.
Anything that reduces this would be a very good way forward.
In our case restricting staff would not help us because with five riders we only run two mechanics per rider which works well if you work as a team unit.
In this case we did our own cost cutting.
However teams with big staff would gain if they were only allowed a given number of mechanics.
It would also make it harder for the Italians as it seems to take more of them to do the job if you look at the fully Italian teams…Only joking so please do not get offended.
In the 90’s we were allowed a certain number of flight tickets and hotel rooms for the flyaway races and restoring this if possible would be a positive investment by Dorna in the championship as a whole.
In BSS and even MotoGP we have seen the organisers working with the teams to place sponsors and this has been lacking in WSB so this would be another way to benefit all parties.
Engine rules for me are good as they are as they allow all makes to be competitive and in the case of Supersport is only really cylinder head tuning so not an expensive part of racing.
In Superbike you will hear teams saying that standard parts are less reliable; but it works well in Supersport and with a control ECU we can restrict revs as high revs are a major part of shorter engine life.
Pirelli have done a great job as control tyre supplier but restricting the amount of tyres we all use per event I believe would not affect the results at all but could reduce the tyre fee for the season.
In fact it would force teams to work more on race set up which would be a good thing.
We all like the one fast lap achieved in qualifying by throwing new tyres at it but at the end of the day there are no points for this.
We all are wary of change but as we have seen with the one bike rule, it reduced the cost of racing and made it possible for teams like us to run more riders out of one truck and allowed more teams in and rejuvenated the grid in Supersport.
As you all know now we have a completely new rider line up for 2013.
It will be hard to repeat the fantastic job we all did as a team with Cluzel and Lowes but I sincerely believe that Sheridan Morais will be a major player and young matt Davies will go from strength to strength.
Luca Marconi will take a big step forward in our team and David Linortner after his impressive wild card 8th at the Nurburgring will be working hard to carry that type of performance to all the circuits this year.
Nacho Perez was running very well in Stock 600 last year until injury set him back and we will all be right behind him as he makes his debut in WSS.
There will be no pressure on him so we will target points to start with and build form there.
Here is to another great year of racing in 2013.
Cheers Simon

0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

More To Read

rally car racing 2
Automotive

The 10 best road-going rally cars ever

Rallies have gone on for many years now and despite its age, racing cars still gain new fans even now. That said we are looking at retro vehicles and so…
james lebron
Automotive

10 surprising celebrities’ cars

This list of 10 surprising celebrities cars will surprise you. Not a compendium of expensive vehicles, but an hymn to modesty.
Contentsads.com