Al Carns, the UK's Armed Forces minister, has resigned following a dispute over the government's defense spending plan, adding to the political turmoil.

The UK government is facing another significant blow as Al Carnsthe Armed Forces ministerhas resigned just hours after John Healeythe Defense Secretarystepped down over the same issue. Both ministers expressed concerns that the Defense Investment Plan (DIP) is neither transformative enough nor sufficiently funded to meet the current global threats.
The resignations come at a critical time, with tensions mounting within the cabinet over the long-delayed defense plan, which outlines how new equipment and infrastructure will be funded over the next decade. The prime minister, Sir Keir Starmerhas defended the spending plan, appointing Dan Jarvis to replace Healey.
Healey’s Resignation and the Spending Dispute
John Healey resigned at 12:09 pm on June 11, 2026, stating that the financial settlement for the defense plan falls well short of what is required. He criticized the prime minister and the chancellor for being unwilling to commit the resources needed to defend the country at a time of rising threats.
Healey’s resignation was followed by that of his parliamentary private secretary, Pamela Nashwho cited the delays and difficulties surrounding the DIP as damaging to public trust.
Healey’s departure was seen as a significant loss, given his long-standing service as a Labour MP and his role as defense secretary under Starmer. His resignation letter highlighted the need for increased defense spending, particularly in the first two years when the imperative to speed up readiness to fight is most critical.
Carns’ Resignation and the Broader Implications
Al Carnswho had hinted at resigning if the investment plan was not right by the armed forcesofficially stepped down at 8:22 pm on the same day. In his resignation letter, Carns stated that the DIP is not built for the threat we face and is neither transformative enough nor sufficiently funded. He emphasized that the plan is based on a budget written for a calmer worldnot the more unstable and dangerous world the UK currently faces.
Carns, a former Marine, expressed his inability to defend a level of investment he knew was inadequate to the task. He pointed out that the character of conflict is changing faster than the UK’s procurement can keep up with, highlighting the need for a serious defense investment plan that addresses these evolving threats.
The Government’s Response and Political Reactions
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer defended the spending plan, stating that his government is delivering the largest sustained increase in defense spending since the Cold War. He appointed Dan Jarvis as the new Defense Secretary, emphasizing the need to strengthen the armed forces and meet the growing threats facing the country.
The political fallout from these resignations has been significant. Kevin Cravenchief executive of the ADS Groupdescribed Healey’s resignation as truly a damning reflection on the current state of affairs. He warned that the consequences of getting the defense investment plan wrong are of a magnitude far beyond our worst fears.
Other political figures, including Zack Polanski of the Green Party and Liz Saville Roberts of Plaid Cymru, criticized the government’s handling of the situation, with Polanski calling it a government with no leadership, under a caretaker PM.
The resignations have raised stark questions about Starmer’s authority and the government’s ability to address the growing threats in an increasingly unstable world.
