The 2026 World Cup is facing criticism over its expansion to 48 teams and visa restrictions impacting fans from various countries
The 2026 world Cup, set to be the largest in history with 48 teams, is facing significant criticism on multiple fronts. From concerns about the tournament’s expansion to allegations of financial motives and visa restrictions affecting fans, the event is becoming a focal point for debate.
The expansion from 32 to 48 teams was justified by FIFA as a means to increase global interest in the sport. However, critics argue that the move is primarily driven by financial gains. The attorney generals of New York and New Jersey have launched an investigation into FIFA’s ticketing practices, alleging that fans were misled about seat locations and that ticket blocks were withheld to drive up prices.
Criticism Over Sponsorship and Sportswashing
Dr. Oscar Berglund, a senior lecturer in international public and social policy at the University of Bristol, has been vocal about the tournament’s role in sportswashing. He argues that football has become a primary target for such practices, citing the Trump Peace Prize and the sponsorship deal with Saudi Aramco as examples.
Environmental charities have also criticized FIFA for partnering with a major oil company, despite FIFA president Gianni Infantino’s claims that the deal will focus on developing grassroots sport initiatives.
Visa Restrictions and Fan Anger
Fans from more than a quarter of the qualifying countries are facing travel bans, tighter restrictions, or high visa rejection rates. Iraqi fan Abdulla Adnan, for instance, has been unable to secure a visa to travel to the US to see his country play. Despite not being on the travel ban list, Adnan faced unexpected obstacles due to security concerns in the region. Fans from countries like Haiti, Iran, Senegal, and Ivory Coast are also affected by President Trump’s travel bans and greater restrictions on visas.
Julien Kouadio Adonis from the Ivory Coast’s fan association, the National Committee for the Support of the Elephants, describes the restrictions as a form of segregation. He argues that a country that doesn’t welcome supporters from qualifying teams shouldn’t be allowed to host the World Cup. The visa application process, which includes in-person interviews and proof of intent to depart, adds another layer of complexity for fans.
Senegalese fan Aliou Ngom, who has attended the last two World Cups, highlights the cultural exchange that the tournament brings. However, he also feels that the visa restrictions make it nearly impossible for fans from certain countries to attend. The high visa rejection rates for citizens of 11 qualifying countries, including Ecuador, Egypt, and Ghana, further complicate the situation for fans.
The 2026 World Cup is shaping up to be a tournament of contrasts, with the excitement of expanded participation tempered by significant controversies and challenges for fans. As the event approaches, these issues are likely to gain more attention and spark further debate.
